To answer this question, let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) JPG's render true color poorly at some screen resolutions, whereas GIFs do not. This option is incorrect. Both JPG and GIF formats support true color rendering, so the choice of file format does not affect the rendering of true color.

Option B) The GIF file format is tailored to the Internet, whereas the JPG was developed for storage only. This option is incorrect. While it is true that GIF was originally developed for the internet and supports animation, JPG is also widely used for web graphics and is suitable for internet use.

Option C) The file compression features of the JPG format may render the fonts unreadable. This option is correct. One of the main differences between GIF and JPG formats is the compression algorithm used. JPG uses lossy compression, which can result in a loss of quality, especially in areas with sharp edges or text. This can make the fonts in the image less readable compared to a GIF file.

Option D) JPG's are about three times the size of GIFs and therefore take more time to render in a browser. This option is incorrect. JPG files are generally larger in size compared to GIF files due to the compression algorithm used, but the size difference is not typically three times. Additionally, the rendering time in a browser depends on various factors, such as the file size, internet connection, and browser capabilities, rather than just the file format.

The correct answer is C) The file compression features of the JPG format may render the fonts unreadable. This option is correct because the lossy compression used in JPG files can result in a loss of quality, making the fonts in the image less readable compared to a GIF file.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand the concept of web-safe colors. Web-safe colors refer to a set of colors that can be accurately displayed on most computer monitors and web browsers.

Option A) 256 - This option is incorrect. While there are 256 possible values for each primary color (red, green, and blue) in the RGB color model, not all combinations of these values are web-safe.

Option B) 216 - This option is correct. The web-safe color palette consists of 216 colors, which are created by using only 6 values (0, 51, 102, 153, 204, and 255) for each primary color (red, green, and blue) in the RGB color model. These 216 colors were chosen to ensure that they can be accurately displayed on most monitors.

Option C) 256,000 - This option is incorrect. While there are 256 possible values for each primary color in the RGB color model, the total number of possible colors is calculated by multiplying the number of values for each primary color. In this case, it would be 256 x 256 x 256 = 16,777,216.

Option D) 17,000,000 - This option is incorrect. The total number of possible colors in the RGB color model is 16,777,216, as explained in the previous option.

The correct answer is B) 216. This option is correct because the web-safe color palette consists of 216 colors that can be accurately displayed on most computer monitors and web browsers.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand the purpose and behavior of opening links in a separate window.

Option A) Have another window open making it easier for the user to surf the linked website - This option is incorrect because opening a link in a separate window does not necessarily make it easier for the user to surf the linked website. It depends on the user's preference and their browsing habits.

Option B) Keep my website in the original window so the user will come back to it - This option is correct because opening a link in a separate window allows the user to visit the linked website while keeping the original website open in the original window. This ensures that the user can easily return to the original website after exploring the linked website.

Option C) Be sure that the user has JavaScript enabled in their browser - This option is incorrect because opening a link in a separate window does not directly relate to ensuring that the user has JavaScript enabled in their browser. The behavior of opening links in a separate window can be achieved without JavaScript.

The correct answer is B) Keep my website in the original window so the user will come back to it. This option is correct because opening a link in a separate window allows the user to explore the linked website while keeping the original website accessible in the original window.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation