Whose character is relevant under Section 53 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

D is an accused of commission of murder and was in the custody of a police officer. During police custody, he confessed his crime. He gave all information to the police officer. On the basis of this information, the police officer found the weapon of the murder.

Weapons found from the information of accused may be proved against him according to which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

A confessed in court to murdering X. B also gave evidence against A. But during trial, it appeared to the court that the confession was caused by inducement, threat or promise in reference to charge and such inducement, threat or promise was caused by B.

What is/are the value(s) of confession of A according to Section 24 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

A helped B in the commission of a theft. After the commission of theft, they were arrested and a joint trial was started against both of them.(There are two stages provided in the statement. Before the trial started and after the trial started.)

What would you call A in the first stage?

A, B and C were walking together. While walking, B said that he had lent Rs. 20,000 to A and Rs. 5,000 to C a few months ago. A admitted that he owes Rs. 20,000 to B. C, who was listening to both A and B, refused and said that he owes nothing to A.

Which of the following persons admission can be proved against himself/themselves according to Section 21 of Indian Evidence Act?

B lends Rs. 5000 to C and asks him to make admission for the same in front of some other people. C agreed to do so.

In which of the following forms can C make an admission according to Section 17 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

What is the evidential value of self-harming admissions?

Oral evidence can be given upon which of the following facts?

Oral admission is not relevant unless genuineness of the electronic record is in question under which of the following sections of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

When should evidence of admission not be given according to Section 23 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Under whose threat is confession made by an accused not relevant as per the provisions of Section 24 of Indian Evidence Act?

According to Section 29 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confessions otherwise relevant do not become irrelevant because of some facts.

Which of the following facts will not affect the relevancy of confession as per the provisions of the above section?

X and Y were tried together for the same offence. During trial, Y confessed to the offence. It affected him and his co-accused.

Under which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is the confession of Y relevant?

Confession made under Section 25 is not admissible to

In which of the following cases is section 23 of Indian Evidence Act applicable?