the Privy Council

the Kings Division Bench

the House of Lords

none of these

international personality

corporate personalitya

political entity

political personality

1962

1961

1963

1964

Surjeet Singh Thind Vs. Kanwaijit Kaur

Phillipa Anne Vs. State of Tamil Nadu State

Hameeda Sarfaraj Vs. M.S. Kashekar

Kavita Vs. State of Maharashtra

Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation

Both (A) and (R) are correct, but (R) is not the correct explanation

(A) is true, but (R) is false

(A) is false, but (R) is true

1st amendment 1951

42nd amendment 1976

44th amendment 1978

52nd amendment 1985

Contract

Quasi Contract

Tort

Legal contract

Assertion and Reason are wrong

Assertion and Reason are right

Assertion is right, but Reason is wrong

Assertion is wrong, but Reason is right

Simple physical assault

Molestation

Outraging of modesty

Rape

Robbery

Dacoity

Murder

Rape

(a) - i, (b) - ii, (c) - iii, (d) - iv

(a) - i, (b) - iii, (c) - iv, (d) - i

(a) - iv, (b) - iii, (c) - ii, (d) - i

(a) - ii, (b) - i, (c) - iv, (d) - iii

Shamim Ara Vs. State of U.P., AIR 2002 SCW 4162

Mohammad Ahmad Khan Vs. Shah Bano AIR 1985 SC 365

Bai Tahira Vs. Ali Hussain, AIR 1979 SC 362

None of the above

Right to form association

Right to equality before law

Right to freedom of press

Right to assemble peaceably and without arms

Austin

Holland

Kelson

Bentham

Appovier Vs. Rama Subba Aiyar

Collector of Madura Vs. Mootoo Ramalinga

Atmaram Vs. Bajirao

Arunachala Mudaliar Vs. Murugantha

Retributive theory of punishment

Reformative theory of punishment

Deterrent theory of punishment

Preventive theory of punishment

'a' is not guilty of theft as property belongs to him.

'a' is guilty of theft as he is only a joint owner.

'a' is guilty of criminal misappropriation.

'a' is guilty of breach of trust.

Parliament should support religions

State and religion are inseparable

State does not recognise any religion as a State religion

People arc free to worship State recognised religion

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

Both (A) and (R) are true. but (R) is not the correct explanation of A.

(A) is true, but (R) is false.

(A) is false, but (R) is true.

Nullity of marriage

Judicial separation

Divorce

None of the above

(A) is correct, but (R) is wrong

(R) is correct, but (A) is wrong

Both (A) and (R) are correct

Both (A) and (R) are wrong

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is a correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not a correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true but (R) is false

(A) is false but (R) is true

When it is considered that an action should never have been bought

When the purpose of the action is merely to establish a right

When it is necessary to compensate the plaintiff

To punish the defendant and to deter him from similar conduct in future

a - (ii), b - (iii), c - (iv), d - (i)

a - (iii), b - (iv), c - (ii), d - (i)

a - (iv), b - (iii), c - (i), d - (ii)

a - (iv), b - (iii), c - (ii), d - (i)

(a)-(i), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(iv)

(a)-(ii), (b)-(i), (c)-(iv), (d)-(iii)

(a)-(iii), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(i)

(a)-(iv), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(i)