Law (UGC/NET Paper II & III)
Description: Test - 9 | |
Number of Questions: 25 | |
Created by: Shaka Gupte | |
Tags: Test - 9 United Nations Nature of International Laws and it;s relationship with Municipal Law Legal Theory Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Judiciary Industrial Dispute and Workman Remedies for Breach of Contract-Damages Laws of Torts Constitution Law of India Concepts-Industry |
The purpose of the United Nations are: (i) To maintain International Peace and Security (ii) To establish World Government (iii) To develop friendly relations among Member States (iv) To secure International cooperation in solving problems of social. economic and humanitarian character. Of these following are correct:
Monism and dualism theories are:
Given below are two statements one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R) Match the correct.
Assertion (A): International law is not a law.
Reason (R): States do not accept international law.
Which of the followings is not condition for a marriage under section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
Consider the following Judgements of the Supreme Court, which dealt with the appointment and transfer of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts: (i) S.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India
Where a contract contains a stipulation by way of penalty on breach of contract, the aggrieved party is entitled for compensation:
Respondent superior 'means
Consider the following decisions on the meaning of the employer under section 2 (g) of the industrial Disputes Act. Identify the correct order in which they appeared: (i) Bombay Dock Labour Board Vs. Stevedone workers (ii) Western India Automobile Association Vs. Industrial Tribunal (iii) Kays Construction Co (P) Ltd. Vs. Its work men (iv) Anakapalle cooperative Agricultural and Industrial Society Vs. Its workmen
Which one of the following jurists opined that crime is an act or omission in violation of public rights?
Arrage the sequence of the following events in which they occur in a contract, using the code: (i) Communication of offer (ii) Inviation of offer (iii) Fraud (iv) Damages
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that 'the members of nonrecognised union cannot be represented in collective bargaining proceedings or individual grievances of its members'.
Which of the following statement is correct?
Match the following words with their correct Article from codes given below:
List - I | |
List - II | |
(a) Freedom of association | |
(i) Article 14 | |
(b) Right of reservation | |
(ii) Article 21 | |
(c) Right of livelihood | |
(iii) Article 19 | |
(d) Right of habeas corpus | |
(iv) Article 22 | |
Fundamental Rights are
The Nauiila Incident relates to:
Assertion (A) : Break down of marriage as such is not a ground for divorce. Reason (R) : It may result into an easy way of dissolution of marriage and shall result into instability in the society.
Ignorantia tacit doth excusat means:
Match the List - I and List - Il using following code:
List - I | |
List - Il | |
(a) Registration of Marriage | |
(i) S. 112 Evidence Act | |
(b) Presumption of Marriage | |
(ii) S. 7 HM Act | |
(c) Presumption of legitimacy of child | |
(iii) S. 114 Evidence Act | |
(d) Marriage religious ceremonies | |
(iv) Section 8 HM Act | |
In which of the following cases the plea of sovereign immunity can be taken:
Match List-I with List-Il and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:
List-I | |
List-Il | |
I. Right to go abroad | |
1. Olga Tellis's case | |
II. Right to livelihood | |
2. Mohini Jams case | |
III. Right against sexual harassment | |
3. Menaka Gandhi's case | |
IV. Right to education | |
4. Vishakas case | |
Where no form of marriage was gone through under section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the marriage is:
In which of the following Cases it is well established that, any settlement between the employer and with one or more concerned union in a conciliation proceeding would bind all other workmen unions who were not made parties to the settlement:
Assertion (A) : X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly, each separately inflicts wounds on Z. Z dies. X and Y can be tried jointly. Reason (R) : Two or more persons can be tried jointly if the act, resulting in an offence, is done in furtherance of a common intention. Select your answer using the codes given below:
Match List - I and List - II using the codes given below:
List - I (Industry) | |
List - II (Judicial decision) | |
(a) Cooperatives | |
(i) Corporation of city of Nagpur case | |
(b) Charitable Institution | |
(ii) Prabhudayal Vs. Alwar Shakari Bhurni Vikas | |
(c) Educational Institution run by a corporation | |
(iii) Ramkrishna lyvar Vaidyanathan Vs. Fifth Industrial Tribunal | |
(d) Chartered accountants | |
(ii) Bombay pinjarapole case | |
Which of the following Articles of the constitution of India provide for circumstances under which parliament has power to make a law on any subject enumerated in the state list?