legal, while the latter is factual

provisional and the latter is definite

informal, while the latter is formal

explicit and the latter is implicit

A state has duty to become a party to every multilateral treaty.

A state has a right to decide whether or not to become a party to a multilateral treaty and if it decides to become a party, it has a right to make reservation to limit its participation in any way it chooses.

A state has a right to decide whether or not to become a party to multilateral treaty and if it decides to become a party, it should accept the whole treaty.

A state has a right to decide whether or not to become a party to multilateral treaty and if it decides to become a party, it may do so with or without reservations, provided that its reservations are compatible with the objects and purposes.

principle of succession to delictual liabilities

customary right relating to territory

succession and public debts

succession to non-fiscal contractual rights

by the General Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council

by the Security Council on the recommendation of the General Assembly

in a joint session of the Security Council and General Assembly

by the permanent members of the Security Council

Treaty of Westphalia

1815 Vienna Conference

First World War

Second World War

Serbian loans case

Mavrommatis Palestine concessions case

Chozow factory indemnity case

South-West Africa case

represent two entirely distinct legal system

are the concomitant aspects of one system

are not enforceable

are not binding

superiority of states

dominance of the USA over other states

peremptory norms of the International Law

superiority of United Nations

The reservation and the objection cancel each other and all the provisions of the treaty will apply to all parties.

The provisions of the treaty to which the reservation applies, shall not apply between the reserving state and the objecting state, unless the objecting state specifically objects to the entry into force of the treaty as between the two states.

The reservation and the objection prevent the treaty from coming into force in respect of all of its parties.

The objection invalidates the reservation and the reserving state ceases to be a party to the treaty.

the International Council

the Security Council

the mediation of the Soviet Union

international arbitration

Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are individually true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

A is true, but R is false.

A is false, but R is true.

Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are individually true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

A is true, but R is false.

A is false, but R is true.

the International Court of Justice is empowered to implement its decisions

if any party to a case fails to perform its obligations under the judgment, the Security Council is empowered to implement the judgment of the court, provided the matter is referred to it by ICJ

if any party to a case fails to perform its obligations under the judgment, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council, which may decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment

if any party to a case fails to perform its obligations under the judgment of the ICJ, the Security Council may decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment, on the recommendation of the General Assembly

A law declaring an act of a citizen illegal, regardless of the place where it is committed

A law declaring illegal a contract between a national and foreigner concluded within the country

A law declaring illegal a transaction between two foreigners concluded to be performed in their respective countries

A law declaring illegal an act on board a national aircraft or a national vessel

Customary rules of international law are diminishing and are being replaced by law making treaties and conventions.

States do not deny the existence of international law. On the contrary, they interpret international law making so as to justify their conduct.

A great limitation of international law is that it cannot intervene in the matters which are within the domestic jurisdiction of states.

International law is positive morality of state having no force.